Space and Emotion: the Places of Rome Study Day @ ARC Centre of Excellence for the History of Emotions (Melbourne Node)

Space and Emotion: the Places of Rome
A study day presented by the ARC Centre of Excellence for the History of Emotions

Date: November 4, 2016
Time: 10:00am – 5:00pm
Venue: Arts West, Room 361, The University of Melbourne
Register here: http://alumni.online.unimelb.edu.au/s/1182/match/wide.aspx?sid=1182&gid=1&pgid=10086&content_id=7326
Convenors: Lisa Beaven and Mark Seymour

For westerners perhaps more than any other city, Rome has long been a place of richly emotional imaginings – political, cultural, and spiritual. This one-day workshop is conceived as an exploration of the links between space, place and emotion, reflecting on how Rome as myth and Rome as space and place interact. It brings together scholars who work in diverse disciplines and across a millennium or two of time. It will be experimental, imaginative and informal, allowing scholars to enrich their own analyses through cross-pollination with insights from a diverse range of work.

Speakers will include: Rhiannon Evans, Robert Gaston, Lisa Beaven, Katrina Grant, Mark Seymour (University of Otago), Flavia Marcello,
Angela Ndalianis.

Abstracts and speaker bios available to download here: http://www.historyofemotions.org.au/events/space-and-emotion-the-places-of-rome

Prison/Exile: Controlled Spaces in Early Modern Europe – Call For Papers

Prison/Exile: Controlled Spaces in Early Modern Europe
Ertegun House, University of Oxford
10-11 March, 2017

This conference seeks to explore the relationship between space, identity, and religious belief in early modern Europe, through the correlative, yet distinct experiences of imprisonment and exile. The organisers welcome all paper proposals that explore the phenomena of imprisonment and exile in the early modern period, especially those that relate these modalities of control to the complex and evolving religious thought of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Europe. At a time when incarceration or exile was a distinct possibility, even likelihood, for many of Europe’s innovative thinkers, how did the experience of imprisonment or banishment influence the texts—theological, political, and literary—produced in the early modern period? How did early modern individuals inhabit, conceptualise, and represent “unfree” space? How does the spatial turn help us to investigate the impact of the confines of prison or the exile’s physical separation from their community on the production and development of religious thought? Does imprisonment or exile exaggerate polemical language and heighten sectarian differences, or induce censorship and temper dissenting voices?

Keynote lectures will be given by Professor Rivkah Zim (King’s College, London) and Professor Bruce Gordon (Yale University).

We invite 20-minute papers, from literary, historical, theological, and interdisciplinary perspectives, on these themes. We are especially interested in papers connecting imprisonment and exile, and in those linking physical spaces with the world of ideas and texts. Potential topics might include, but are not limited to:

  • prison writings and literature produced in exile
  • the emergence of the prison as a mode of punishment, including responses to the work of Michel Foucault, Norbert Elias, and other theorists
  • the utility of the genre of prison writings, alongside considerations of audience, reception, and intention
  • spatial confines of imprisonment
  • captivity, relationships between captor and captive, cultural issues arising from captivity
    mental and physical separation from community
  • distinctions and connections between imprisonment and exile
  • monastic prisons
  • literary consolation
  • literary and figurative conceptualisations of imprisonment and exile
  • mental and physical isolation, and afflictions experienced whilst incarcerated
  • imprisonment or exile as themes or images in theology and exegesis

The organisers, Spencer Weinreich, Chiara Giovanni, and Anik Laferrière, look forward to receiving proposals, particularly from postgraduate students and early career researchers, and are glad to answer any queries. Proposals should include a title and abstract of a maximum of 250 words, and should be sent to prisonexileoxford@gmail.com by 9 January, 2017.

Professor Adam Potkay and Associate Professor Vivasvan Soni – Joint Seminar @ The University of Melbourne

Adam Potkay and Vivasvan Soni – Joint Seminar

Date: 3 November, 2016
Time: 12:30pm-2:30pm
Venue: 2nd floor meeting room, John Medley Building, The University of Melbourne
Register: Register online here

“Something Evermore about to Be: The Transformation of Hope in the Romantic Era”, Professor Adam Potkay (College of William & Mary)

In my talk, I’ll sketch what happens to the Janus-faced figures of hope in the course of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. My argument is this: hope, once a theological virtue and potential secular vice, features in the eighteenth century as a neutral element of secular psychology. As a psychological mechanism, hope comes in the Romantic era to underwrite a new, semi-secularized virtue: the hope, more or less independent of revealed religion, for more life, a better or perfected condition of the individual or of the species in time or eternity. This new and indeterminate hope directs us, however, towards a receding horizon. It is hope that aims “beyond hope,” and beyond conceptualization: William Wordsworth’s “something evermore about to be”; Percy Shelley’s hope for a hope realized beyond “its own wreck”; John Stuart Mill’s imaginative hope that arises on the far side of his rebuttal of all arguments for immortality. While Romantic-era hope doesn’t supersede or displace the orthodox theological virtues, it does supplement or vie with them, and thus figures in what has been called the modern “differentiation” between religious and secular/poetic modes of authority.


Adam Potkay is the William R. Kenan, Jr. Professor of Humanities and Professor of English at the College of William & Mary, Virginia, USA. His most recent books are Wordsworth’s Ethics (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012) and The Story of Joy from the Bible to Late Romanticism (Cambridge University Press, 2007), winner of the American Comparative Literature Association’s Harry Levin Prize. The Story of Joy has been translated into Portuguese (Brazil), Romanian, and Polish. Professor Potkay is currently working on a glossary of ethics/emotions in literature.




“”Gigantic Shadows of Futurity”: Some Modern Anxieties about Representing the Future”, Associate Professor Vivasvan Soni (Northwestern University)

Modernity is often characterized by a fascination with change, revolution, novelty and the future. One might think, for example, of Bacon’s proposals for a futuristic academy of science at the end of New Atlantis, or the aesthetics of novelty as it comes to be articulated in the eighteenth century. Moderns, we are told, are so obsessed with their orientation to the future, their desire to bring about the future, that they risk becoming unmoored from the past and tradition. Yet there is a paradox lurking here, namely that there is also within modernity a pervasive unease about representing the future. My paper will explore this unease, and some of the reasons for it. I will begin by discussing some examples from contemporary critical theory, such as Derrida’s messianism, Jameson’s “utopian archipelago,” or Edelman’s No Future. I will then consider how the aversion to representing the future might have its genesis in certain cultural and intellectual formations of the long eighteenth century: Bacon’s critique of final causes; Locke’s account of motivation in the Essay; Mandeville’s articulation of a market logic of cognition that becomes so pervasive in the period; certain aspects of realist representation in eighteenth-century novels; Romantic imaginings of the the future in Wordsworth’s Prelude or Shelley’s Prometheus Unbound.


Vivasvan Soni is associate professor of English at Northwestern University. His book, Mourning Happiness: Narrative and the Politics of Modernity (2010), won the Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book. He is working on a project that probes the long history of our discomfort with judgment, tracing its genesis in eighteenth-century discourses of empiricism and aesthetics.

The Society for Theatre Research: Paul Iles Bequest – Call For Applications

The Society for Theatre Research annually makes Research Awards, which are wholly and exclusively for research into aspects of the British Theatre. However, the Society has received a substantial bequest from the estate of the late Paul Iles, the terms of which state that it is to be used: “specifically for research awards in the area of Australian theatre”.

Initial declarations of interest and outline proposals are invited. Although it is expected that projects dealing with Paul’s own interests (such as postcolonial/post-British dominated theatre in Australia, and in particular those companies he was closely associated with – the State Theatre Co at the Adelaide Festival, the Nimrod Theatre of Sydney and the North Queensland Theatre Co.) would be favourably considered, the field is open to other topics.

There is up to £10,000 available; it has not been decided whether there will be several small awards, just one major award, or a mix of larger and smaller. That will depend on the number and quality of the projects submitted. This is a one-off event, so there is likely to be more discussion possible around the development of the chosen project(s) than there can be over the normal STR Awards. There is no application form for awards from this Bequest and there is no specific closing date for these awards: applicants are encouraged to send in outline proposals as soon as may be convenient, after which there may be further discussion and development with the committee (via email). It is expected, nevertheless, that an announcement of successful proposals will be made in 2017. Please send submissions to awards@str.org.uk.

Art as Meaning: Redefining Communication – Call For Papers

Art as Meaning: Redefining Communication
School of the Arts & Media (SAM) Postgraduate Symposium
Robert Webster Building, UNSW Kensington
18 November, 2016

‘My work is utterly incomprehensible and is therefore full of deep significance?’
Calvin of Calvin and Hobbes

Intentional or unintentional, an audience reads a message in the works we create. I ‘love it’ and I ‘hate it’ are visceral reactions to the messages conveyed. Regardless of the medium, and the tools used to create, they all share a commonality: the conveyance of meaning. What meanings are conveyed? How? For what purpose? The focus of this conference is to turn our attention to the messages that artists are sharing and to discuss the meanings, themes, and ideologies present within artistic works that are understood by viewers, readers, and listeners. Throughout these talks, we hope to share the many ways that meaning is imparted across disciplines, and broaden our definitions of communication.

Key note speaker: Emeritus Professor, Theo van Leeuwen, University of Technology, Sydney

Call for Papers

Please send an abstract to sampg@unsw.edu.au.

A proposal of maximum 250 words is expected.

We are welcome to various fields of Arts: Literature, Cultural Studies, Media, Music, Creative Writing, Performing Arts, Journalism, and so on.

Deadline for submission: 30 October, 2016.

Associate Professor Mark Seymour, The University of Melbourne Free Public Lecture

“Emotional Arenas: Historicising Emotions through Spaces and Places in Nineteenth-Century Italy,” Associate Professor Mark Seymour (The University of Otago)

Date: Thursday 27 October 2016
Time: 6:15pm–7:30pm
Venue: Arts West North Wing-361, Collaborative Learning Room, Bld 148, The University of Melbourne
Enquiries: che-melb-admin@unimelb.edu.au

Registration not required.

The ARC’s CHE and other centres around the world attest to the fact that over the past decade emotions have emerged as a dynamic field of historical inquiry. In the process, terms such as ‘emotives’, emotional ‘regimes’, ‘communities’ and ‘practices’ have now established secure places in the scholarly lexicon. Yet historians pursuing this evanescent quarry could still do with further conceptual tools that might help to pin down, visualise, and analyse moments and mechanisms of emotional change in the past. Based on ideas developed through research on marriage, love affairs, a murder and a sensational trial in 1870s Italy, this seminar proposes historicising emotions in a way that emphasises space and place. Italy’s rapid transformation from ancien-régime backwater to constitutional nation provides the context for my argument that the spaces and places of modern western life function as ‘emotional arenas’, where subjective feelings meet the external world in a process of mutually re-shaping interplay.


Mark Seymour is Associate Professor of History at The University of Otago, New Zealand. He received a BA (Hons) from The University of Sydney, and an MA and PhD from the University of Connecticut. His research area is nineteenth- and twentieth-century Italy, with a particular interest in the nexus between private life and more public, institutional forces. His first book, Debating Divorce in Italy (Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), reconstructed Italy’s long struggle (1870–1970) to introduce a divorce law. He has since published articles in Social History, Rethinking History, Gender and History, Storicamente, and the Journal of Modern Italian Studies. In 2012, with Penelope Morris and Francesco Ricatti, he co-edited a special issue of Modern Italy on ‘Italy and the Emotions’ and the volume Politica ed emozioni nella storia d’Italia dal 1848 ad oggi (Rome: Viella). His most recent article was a review essay for the Journal of Women’s History on love and politics from eighteenth-century America to twentieth-century East Germany (2015). He is co-editor of the journal Modern Italy.

ANZAMEMS PATS 2017: “Marginalia and Markings: Reading Medieval and Early Modern Readers” – Call for Applications

Marginalia and Markings: Reading Early Modern and Medieval Readers
The National Library of New Zealand, Wellington
Saturday 11 February, 2017

Presenters include: Professor Lorna Hutson (Oxford), Associate Professor Rosalind Smith (Newcastle, Australia), Dr Malcolm Mercer (Royal Armouries, Tower of London), Dr Anthony Tedeschi (National Library of New Zealand)

A Postgraduate Advanced Training Seminar (PATS) will be held on the day following the ANZAMEMS conference in Wellington, on Saturday 11 February (9-5pm).

This PATS workshop will maximise the presence of multiple international experts in Wellington for the ANZAMEMS biennial conference, and link their scholarship on marginalia and markings in early books to the special collections of the National Library of New Zealand. Each of the presenters has distinct expertise in working with marginalia and other reader markings in medieval and early modern manuscripts and printed books, and the National Library’s collections provide ample materials for hands-on examination and discussion by PATS participants.

This one-day workshop will take the form of speaker presentations in the morning, followed by student-focused workshop sessions in the afternoon. Numbers are strictly limited to 20 students.

Morning tea, afternoon tea, and lunch will be provided for all participants.

A strictly limited number of bursaries will be available to support postgraduate student attendance at the PATS. Applications for these bursaries can be submitted with your application for the PATS.

For full details and to apply, please visit: https://anzamems2017.wordpress.com/pats

Applications close on Friday 4 November, 2016.

Folger Shakespeare Library: Long- and Short-Term Fellowships 2017/18

The Folger Shakespeare Library in Washington DC supports research on all aspects of British and European literary, cultural, political, religious, theatrical, and social history from the fifteenth through the eighteenth centuries. The collections include over 160,000 printed books, 60,000 manuscripts, and 90,000 prints, costumes, drawings, photographs, paintings, historical objects, and other works of art.

APPLY BY 1 NOVEMBER 2016
For long-term fellowships with residencies of six to nine months. Stipends up to $50,000.

APPLY BY 1 MARCH 2017
For short-term fellowships with residencies of one to three months. Stipends of $2,500 per month.

We welcome applications from humanities faculty, and also from artists, archivists, curators, independent scholars, and librarians.

APPLY NOW FOR 2017-18: For further information please visit: http://www.folger.edu/fellowships

Art for the Powerful, Multiple Objects: Medals and Tokens in Europe from the Renaissance to the First World War – Call For Papers

Art for the Powerful, Multiple Objects: Medals and Tokens in Europe from the Renaissance to the First World War
Art du puissant, objet multiple: Médailles et jetons en Europe, de la Renaissance à la Première Guerre mondiale
Institut national d’histoire de l’art, Paris
30 March — 1 April, 2017

The medal was revived in the princely courts of fifteenth-century Italy as a commemorative art and quickly adopted by sovereigns across Europe. Medals, tokens, and other metallic objects devoid of fiduciary value became more and more widespread and benefitted from several peaks of popularity in the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries, as illustrated by the metallic histories of Louis XIV or Napoleon, a format adopted by others as far afield as the Tsar of Russia. Whilst changes in taste led the medal to be seen as in or out of fashion at different moments, it has continued to maintain its essentially commemorative function and has been used to express the ideals of all manner of political regimes from monarchies to republics.

This symposium seeks to explore the specificity of a form of official art that associates image and text, producing objects whose message is also partially conveyed by the hierarchy of values intrinsic to the metals used, from the noblest gold to more modest alloys. As objects that can be reproduced, that are easily portable and largely distributed, their biographies also tend to be quite distinct from that of other types of art objects. An initial specificity is that of the role of the engraver whose function oscillates between that of an artist, an artisan, and an agent of a commissioning power. His artistic practice can be considered in some sense as paradoxical in so much as it is constrained by the conventions of the medium and by the outline of the project which his talent is called on to convey in material form. This opens up to the question of the expressive aims of this official art that seeks to capture and commemorate History as it happens, fortifying the glory of the commissioning party. Indeed, medals and tokens represent the result of the interplay of the different actors who contribute to their elaboration: from the initial idea developed by a commissioning power and affiliated scholars, to the drawing of a model, to the production and diffusion of the multiple editions of the final product. Medals also need to be considered as part of a wide range of visual productions that share a common language dedicated to reinforcing the powers in place. Finally, greater attention needs to be paid to the manner in which these objects (and their models) have circulated, in particular by considering the development of a market for modern and contemporary medals and their status in the make-up of private and public coin collections. This may also be an opportunity to consider the reciprocal influence between the evolution of the taste and interest of collectors and production styles, techniques, and themes through time.

This conference will showcase current research that can provide an alternative to a very dispersed historiography dominated by the genre of the catalogue. We hope that a comparative effort, with cases from across Europe, in a large chronological frame will help to establish an interdisciplinary approach to the production and circulation of medals and similar objects; one that reflects their complex nature and the specificity of their biographies. We welcome perspectives from a range of disciplines and research perspectives including art history, social and political history, numismatics, material culture studies, etc.

Proposal of no more than 400 words should be sent accompanied by a short CV before the 6th of November, 2016 to the following address: colloquemedailles2017@gmail.com. Each presentation should aim to be no longer than 20 minutes, and the conference papers will be published. Languages are French and English. The organizing committee will give notice of acceptance by mid December 2016.

Organizing Committee

  • Felicity Bodenstein, docteur en Histoire de l’art, Kunsthistorisches Institut, Florenz, Max-Planck-Institut
  • Thomas Cocano, doctorant en Histoire, EPHE
  • Ludovic Jouvet, doctorant en Histoire de l’art, Université de Bourgogne/ INHA
  • Katia Schaal, doctorante en Histoire de l’art, École du Louvre / Université de Poitiers / INHA
  • Sabrina Valin, doctorante en Histoire de l’art, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre-La Défense

Scientific Committee

  • Marc Bompaire, directeur d’études, EPHE
  • Béatrice Coullaré, chargée de conservation, Monnaie de Paris
  • Frédérique Duyrat, directrice du département des Monnaies, Médailles et Antiques, BnF
  • Victor Hundsbuckler, conservateur du patrimoine, responsable de la Conservation, Monnaie de Paris
  • Thierry Sarmant, conservateur en chef, Service historique de la Défense à Vincennes
  • Philippe Thiébaut, conservateur général du patrimoine, conseiller scientifique, INHA
  • Inès Villela-Petit, conservatrice du patrimoine, département des Monnaies, Médailles et Antiques, BnF

Institutional Partners

  • Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense (École doctorale 395, Milieux, cultures et sociétés du passé et du présent – Laboratoire du HAR, Histoire des Arts et des Représentations)
  • École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)
  • Monnaie de Paris
  • Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF)
  • Institut national d’histoire de l’art (INHA)

Receptions: 2017 Conference of the Australian Early Medieval Association – Call For Papers

Receptions
2017 Conference of the Australian Early Medieval Association
Australian National University, Canberra
21–22 April, 2017

Conference Website

This conference invites papers on the broad theme of the alterity of the Middle Ages. The state of being other or different–otherness–is at the heart of the reception theory and offers the opportunity to investigate the ways the Middle Ages have been received into the modern world; and the ways in which the Medieval world acted as conduit for the transmission of the Classical. We welcome any papers related to all aspects of the Late Antique and Early Medieval periods (c. 400–1150) in all cultural, geographic, religious and linguistic settings, even if they do not strictly adhere to the theme.

Abstracts of 250-300 words for 20-minute papers should be submitted via email to conference@aema.net.au by 15 January, 2017.