Monthly Archives: August 2015

Goya and Spanish Musics Symposium and Concert

Goya and Spanish Musics Symposium and Concert

Date: Sunday 23 August 2015
Time: Symposium 9.30am, Concert 3pm
Venue: Melbourne Conservatorium of Music (The University of Melbourne)
National Gallery of Victoria
Further information: Dr Liz Kertesz

Admission is free and all are welcome.

Goya and Spanish Musics is curated by Michael Christoforidis and hosted by the Melbourne Conservatorium of Music, in partnership with the National Gallery of Victoria and the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for the History of Emotions.

Francisco de Goya was one of the key artists in the transition from the Enlightenment to Romanticism, and his art has been a touchstone for Spanish identity, drawn on repeatedly in music and music theatre.

The symposium, featuring scholars from Spain and Australasia, will explore music in the time of Goya, and examine the artist’s impact on the sensibility and imagery of Spanish musics and musical theatre. A session is devoted to the influence of Goya on the output of Enrique Granados, in celebration of the centenary of his Goyescas, followed by a series of papers on Goyesque elements in theatrical and cinematic works of the 1920s and 1930s.

The program concludes with a recital of chamber music from the time of Goya, performed by staff and students of the Melbourne Conservatorium of Music, in the 17th-18th Century European Paintings Gallery (Level 2, NGV International).

To download the full program, please visit: http://www.historyofemotions.org.au/events/goya-and-spanish-musics.aspx

From Passions to Emotions: Postgraduate Advanced Training Seminar – Call For Applications

From Passions to Emotions – Postgraduate Advanced Training Seminar | ARC Centre of Excellence for the History of Emotions

Date: Friday 25 September, 2015
Time: 9am – 4pm
Venue: Seminar Room 218, Fisher Library, The University of Sydney
More information: Gabriel Watts

Does your research focus on emotions, past or present? Ever wanted to gain a deeper understanding of the conceptual transformations that underpin the emergence of ‘emotions’ as a class of psychological phenomena?

This Postgraduate Advanced Training Seminar (PATS), run by the Sydney Node of the Centre for the History of Emotions, will bring students together with established scholars to discuss the long conceptual history of emotions. The PATS will take place the day after the Centre for the History of Emotions’ ‘Methods Collaboratory’, CHE Postgraduate students in Sydney to attend the Collaboratory are strongly encouraged to apply.

The PATS will consist of four short workshops. Each workshop will focus on a major figure in the history of philosophy 1100 – 1800 (Aquinas, Montaigne, Descartes and Hume). Leading international and Australian historians of philosophy will facilitate the workshops, and students will have the opportunity to discuss their own research.

The philosophical focus of this PATS is intended to allow students from all disciplines situate their own research within a broad conceptual history of emotions.

Cost

There is no cost for this PATS, places are limited however to ensure the day is focused. Lunch and refreshments will be provided, please advise of any dietary requirements when applying.

Bursaries

Bursaries are available for students from outside the Sydney area. If you are intending to apply for a bursary please submit an application form plus a short academic reference before 22 August 2015. Applicants will hear back shortly after 22 August.

For full details of the program, and to download the application form, visit: http://www.historyofemotions.org.au/events/from-passions-to-emotions-postgraduate-advanced-training-seminar.aspx

 

Proposed Routledge History of Monarchy – Call For Contributions

The Royal Studies Network is collaborating with Routledge to develop a comprehensive history of Monarchy for their Histories series (https://www.routledge.com/series/RHISTS). The proposed volume is intending to look at the institution of monarchy as a whole, across ALL periods and places. The final work will feature between 25-40 contributors, will be approximately 200,000-250,000 words and length and may be grouped into three thematic sections: Kingship, Queenship, and Dynasty.

If you would like to propose a contribution, send a 250-500 word abstract of your intended piece. Please note that rather than an overview history of the monarchy of a particular realm, contributions should look at a particular ASPECT of monarchy. Case studies (one or more) could be used to highlight this aspect. For example you could look at ‘Female succession in the Kingdom of Jerusalem’ or ‘Kingship and Masculinity in the Moghul Empire’. Comparative pieces are also welcome such as ‘The impact of consanguinity in the Hapsburg and Saxe-Coburg dynasties’. Please send queries and proposals to monarchyconference@gmail.com.

Deadline for proposals: 1 December 2015.

ANZAMEMS Member News: Derek Whaley – Thoughts on the 10th ANZAMEMS Conference and PATS @ UQ, July 2015

Derek Whaley, Doctoral Candidate, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

It would be disingenuous of me to describe the 10th Biennial Conference of the Australian & New Zealand Association for Medieval & Early Modern Studies (ANZAMEMS) as everything I had hoped it would be. Perhaps that is the result of unrestrained enthusiasm for a medieval and early modern history conference with nothing to compare it to. Or perhaps it is caused by the striking realisation that I do not understand my period nearly as well as I had hoped. In any event, the conference was a wake-up call for me in many respects. It was my first academic history conference and it will not be my last.

One thing that shook the foundations of my understanding of history from the very beginning was the realisation that medieval and early modern history is an extremely vast subject composed of so many myriad parts. It spans the world, and the inclusion of presentations on Japanese and Arab societies really brought that home to me. Roundtable discussions in the evenings showcased the long-standing disagreements between historians over periodisation, globalisation, and female scholarship, as well as what careers are really opened to historians. In the deluge of information, I found myself often drowning in data and saddened that the topics I enjoyed so much were but a drop of water in a torrential rain.

Indeed, being a medieval Capetian historian, I found almost nothing that directly applied to my interests and little that peripherally referenced them. This left me with the onerous task of deciding which sessions I would attend throughout the five days of the conference. Sometimes I had great luck in my decisions, while other times the sessions fell flat for me. I am a particular person with particular interests, so not everything can be made easily interesting to me. I think that organising the papers by subject, while logical, actually hurt some of the sessions by bloating the topics with repetition or ghettoising specific topics that may not have attracted universal appeal. Mixing the various papers in the future may result in more people moving between sessions, but it also may result in higher turnouts for papers that would otherwise be ill attended.

While this was my first official conference, it is not the first time I have heard postgraduate and established historians speak in public. I was raised in the American school of communication and as such, I find the idea of literally reading papers, as many presenters did, to be somewhat tedious if not presented with forethought for the audience. A read paper is very different from a rehearsed presentation and those who presented their material off-script almost universally earned my attention over those those who simply read a modified chapter of their thesis. This is not to say that the content quality was different between the two, only that when presenting, those who speak to the audience come across as more confident and engaging than those who just read.

That being said, I presented my own research on the last session of the last day of the conference and was happy that so many people did attend considering the scheduling. I spoke off script, referencing my PowerPoint slides when necessary and otherwise working off an internal dialogue based on my thesis chapter and other research. It seems to have been well received, but only a few people were able to discuss the presentation since the conference ended immediately afterwards. I hope that if I attend a future conference, an earlier session may be afforded to me because the ability to discuss your topic with others, based partially off of your presentation, seems to be an essential aspect of the conference-going experience.

It is networking with others that the ANZAMEMS conference really succeeded for me. More important than the presentations, the keynotes, and the PATS was the ability to discuss ideas and research dilemmas with other post-graduate and early career historians. From the very first day, I felt welcomed by my peers, a member of the illustrious network of Australian and New Zealand historians. Throughout the course of the conference, I met many people, talked with them at lunch, and went out to dinner with them in the evening. My prized trophies from the conference are not CV-boosting presentation skills but a clutch of business cards I gathered. These are what will keep me in contact with those who will help me in the years to come. Networking is an essential part of careers, especially now, and so meeting new people and expanding your range of contacts all helps to ensure that when the time comes for a career decision, or when a referee is need, or even when you just need a person to talk to about your research, you will be prepared.

On that note, I must end by stating my general disappointment with the Postgraduate Advanced Training Seminar (PATS). Touted to me as an opportunity to expand my skills in a series of intensive training sessions, and advertised by previous PATS-goers as something worth the time, I found myself severely disappointed that nothing of the sort occurred here. The PATS was composed of a kind of present-and-respond format where the keynote speakers and the students all presented their thesis topic in brief and then responded briefly to it. It was not only unhelpful to the majority of us, but rather strange in its formatting. Had this exact same PATS occurred at the beginning of the conference rather than the end, it would have at least served as a postgraduate mixer to allow us to all meet each other and meet some accomplished historians. But placed at the end of the conference, it served only as an awkward footnote to an otherwise stimulating week.

Nonetheless, the ANZAMEMS conference felt like a success and it furnished me with myriad angles to consider in my future research and in my thesis. The range of historians I met while at the conference surprised and delighted me and made me see the lasting importance of medieval and early modern history to the present. Thank you to all the crew that helped make the conference happen and I hope to see you all again in Wellington in 2017.

The City in the Long Eighteenth Century – Call For Papers

Eighteenth-Century Studies, a cross-disciplinary journal committed to publishing the best of current writing on all aspects of eighteenth-century culture, is planning an upcoming special issue dedicated to the theme of the city in the long eighteenth century. Cities were outward-facing centers of connection, through networks of trade, communication, and political authority, but they were also inward-facing communities with distinctive cultures and social lives. With increased urbanization came increased theorization about the effects of city life and new methods of policing and control.

We invite submissions which reflect on topics related to these themes or on other ways in which contemporaries interpreted and understood the experiences of city life. Broadly speaking, how did societies in the long eighteenth-century physically and intellectually construct their cities and what were the consequences, real or perceived, of “the city”? What characteristics defined the eighteenth-century city, and to what extent might the eighteenth century be described as an urban one?

Submissions may originate in any of the disciplines and research methodologies encompassed by eighteenth-century studies, broadly construed (history, philosophy, literature, social sciences, and the arts); those which focus on the Caribbean, Latin America, Asia, or Oceania are especially encouraged.

Submissions should be 7,000–9,000 words, including notes. The deadline for consideration for this issue is January 15, 2016.

Contact Info: Submissions may be sent to ecs57@yale.edu.
Please contact the Managing Editor at amy.dunagin@yale.edu with any questions.
Contact Email: amy.dunagin@yale.edu
https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/eighteenth-century_studies/

Trust and Proof: Translators in Early Modern Print Culture

Trust and Proof: Translators in Early Modern Print Culture
An International Symposium
Hosted by the School of Languages and Linguistics, The University of Melbourne
14–15 August, 2015

Admission is free. Bookings are required. Seating is limited. To register visit: http://alumni.online.unimelb.edu.au/trustandproof

For further information please contact Nadine Forsythe soll-events@unimelb.edu.au or phone +61 03 8344 7482

The influence of translators as cultural agents in early modern Europe was both enhanced and complicated by the growth of the print industry. This symposium interrogates the role and self-image of translators in the context of early modern print culture. How did they seek to exploit new opportunities for the increased reach and currency of their work? In presenting their efforts to their ideal readers, translators routinely insist upon the trustworthiness and creativity of their craft. Celebrating the mediated nature of printed texts, a range of international scholars will address the scope and anxieties of the translator’s task in early modern Europe.


Timetable for Friday 14 August

Theatre 227, 234 Queensberry Street, Carlton
9.00am
Welcome

9.15–10.15am
ANTHONY PYM (ROVIRA I VIRGILI, SPAIN)- Print and Modernity in Translation

10.15–10.45am
Morning Tea

10.45–11.45am
BELÉN BISTUÉ (CONICET AND UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO, ARGENTINA) – ‘Most profitable for all qualities of persons’:
Multi-Version Texts and Translators’ Anxieties in Early Modern Europe

11.45–12.30pm
ANDREA RIZZI (MELBOURNE)- ‘Praising the others’ skills’: Multiple and Collaborative Translation in the Italian Renaissance

12.30–2.00pm
Lunch

2.00–3.00pm
BRIAN RICHARDSON (LEEDS) – The Social Transmission of Translations in Renaissance Italy: Strategies of Dedication

3.00–3.30pm
Afternoon Tea

3.30–4.30pm
ROSALIND SMITH (NEWCASTLE) – ‘Reputed femall, delivered at second hand’: Women, Translation and Religion in Sixteenth-century England

4.30–5.30pm
DEANNA SHEMEK (CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ) – RESPONDENT
Discussion

Timetable for Saturday 15 August

10.00am–12.30pm Graduate Study Space / Seminar room, Level 1, Baillieu Library

Symposium speakers will present and discuss relevant rare books from the Baillieu Library collections, including Francesco Colonna’s Hypnerotomachia Polyphili (printed by Aldus Manutius in 1499).

ANZAMEMS Member News: Rachel Allerton – Thoughts on the 10th ANZAMEMS Conference @ UQ, July 2015

Rachel Allerton, MA Research candidate, Macquarie University

As my first introduction to ANZAMEMS, I found the 2015 10th Biennial Conference programme crammed full of fascinating papers on medieval and early modern topics. It was an educational and useful experience for me as a postgraduate, and I benefited enormously from meeting and hearing established academics in my field talk about their research and theories.

The round table discussions on global medievalism and post PhD employment were specifically aimed at emerging scholars and bore fruit in opening the topic to greater thought and dialogue. I believe ANZAMEMS is in a unique position to provide guidance to emerging scholars and I saw this occurring through the interaction of established academics and postgraduates.

I was also pleased at the initiative in women’s networking undertaken by Dr Dolly MacKinnon (UQ) and Dr Clare Monagle (Macquarie University) with the formation of the Maddern-Crawford Network (MCN) in fostering support and guidance for women in the the field of historical research. This is an enterprise close to my heart as a female postgraduate.

While this was my first attempt at presenting a paper I feel that I gained experienced in not only writing and presenting my research and argument, but also connecting with other scholars and working collaboratively.

I hope to attend the next ANZAMEMS in 2017 in New Zealand. I will start saving now!

Max Weber Post-doctoral Fellowships – Call For Applications

Max Weber Post-doctoral Fellowships
European University Institute

Applications are now open for the Max Weber Programme at the European University Institute (EUI) in Florence, Italy. Amongst the largest, most prestigious and successful post doctoral programmes in the historical and social sciences, and located in one of the most beautiful settings, with truly outstanding research facilities, we offer from 50-60 fully funded 1 and 2 year post doctoral fellowships to applicants within 5 years of receiving their PhD from anywhere in the world in the fields of economics, history, law and social and political sciences. All areas and types of research within these fields are considered. Last year 98% of Fellows found an academic position on completing the Fellowship.

To find out more about the programme and how to apply, go to: http://www.eui.eu/ProgrammesAndFellowships/MaxWeberProgramme/ApplytotheMWP/Index.aspx and http://www.eui.eu/ServicesAndAdmin/AcademicService/Fellowships/MaxWeberFellowships/HowToApply.aspx

Applications close on 25 October, 2015.

Life and Death in Early Modern Philosophy – Call For Papers

Life and Death in Early Modern Philosophy
Conference of the European Society for Early Modern Philosophy and the British Society for the History of Philosophy.
Birkbeck College London and Kings College London
14-16 April, 2016

During the early modern period, upheavals in science, theology and politics prompted philosophers to grapple with two highly-charged questions. What are the limits of life? What are the possibilities of life? Pursuing the first, they probed the relation between life and death. What is it to be a living thing? What distinguishes life from death? In what sense, if any, do living things survive death? Exploring the second question, they turned their attention to the character of a truly human life. What is it for human beings (or particular kinds of human beings) to live well? What role does philosophy play in this process? Is living well an individual project, a political one, or both?

Each of these themes has recently attracted renewed interest among historians of early modern philosophy, and the conference aims to explore them as broadly as possible. The program will be comprised of invited speakers and speakers drawn from an open call for papers. Please see below for details

Confirmed Plenary Speakers:

  • Michael Moriarty, University of Cambridge, UK
  • Ursula Renz, Alpen-Adria-University Klagenfurt, Austria
  • Lisa Shapiro, Simon Fraser University, Canada
  • Mariafranca Spallanzani, University of Bologna, Italy
  • Charles Wolfe, University of Gent, Belgium

Submissions are invited from researchers of all levels, including Ph.D. students, and on any aspect of the conference theme.

To submit, please email an abstract – maximum 800 words and anonymised for blind review – to Susan James (s.james@bbk.ac.uk). The heading of the email should be ‘ESEMP/BSHP abstract’ and the email should contain the author’s details (name, position, affiliation, contact details). The deadline for abstract submission is 20 October, 2015.

Scholars who plan to attend the conference should register by emailing the organizer, Susan James (s.james@bbk.ac.uk) by 7 March, 2016 to give us an accurate idea of numbers.

Further details about registration and funding will be posted in October.

Tahlia Birnbaum, Sydney Medieval and Renaissance Group Lecture

Sydney Medieval and Renaissance Group Lecture
“Creating Familial Obligations: Diplomatic Gift Exchange during the Reign of Athelstan”, Tahlia Birnbaum (University of Sydney)

Date: Wednesday 12 August
Time: 7:00pm for 7:30pm start
RSVP: Non-members of SMRG who wish to attend should contact Luke Kendall (lukekendall@optusnet.com.au)

This paper explores the network of familial diplomatic relations created by Athelstan during his reign (924-39) as part of a system of gift exchange. Athelstan recognised the power of gift
exchange in creating a sense of obligation in the recipient, and used this practice to form a major part of his diplomatic relations. Athelstan established several important alliances with
Continental rulers through gifts of his sisters in marriage, and also through his fostering of foreign princes. Athelstan also shaped his domestic policy around gift exchange. To
complement his military success in the north, Athelstan ensured loyalty was maintained by bestowing gifts on important landholders. In diplomatic relations, both in England and on the
Continent, Athelstan bestowed generous gifts in order to create networks of obligations that guaranteed the loyalty of the recipient.