Monthly Archives: March 2014

Eleventh International Milton Symposium – Call For Papers

Eleventh International Milton Symposium
University of Exeter, England
20-24 July, 2015

The Eleventh International Milton Symposium, normally held every three years, brings together scholars from across the world for five days of lively discussion and convivial exchanges about all things Miltonic.

Plenary speakers include: Maggie Kilgour (McGill), Mary Nyquist (Toronto), David Quint (Yale), and Paul Stevens (Toronto).

Located in the beautiful Devon countryside, close to the sea and to Dartmoor National Park, the cathedral city of Exeter (founded by the Romans) is among those English cities most dramatically affected by the Civil War. Supporters of Parliament secured the city in 1642, and from early in 1643 it served as the western headquarters of the Parliamentary Army. After a determined and prolonged siege, it fell to Royalist forces in the autumn, who so strongly fortified the city that it was re-taken by the Parliamentary Army only in 1646. The rich Civil War History of Exeter will be a feature of the Symposium.

The Programme Committee warmly invites proposals for 20-minute papers on all aspects of Milton studies. Suggested topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Civil War Milton and his (near) contemporaries
  • Paces – geographical, symbolic, textual Families, children, generation(s)
  • Harmony, music, dancing, soundscapes The emotions, the passions, the senses
  • Drama, dialogue, soliloquy Controversy, polemic, satire
  • Biblical, classical, humanist scholarship Death, mortalism, memory
  • Soul/Body Historiography

Proposals for papers (500 words maximum, preferably in the form of an email attachment) should be submitted by 10 June 2014 to Karen Edwards (k.l.edwards@exeter.ac.uk) and Philip Schwyzer (p.a.schwyzer@exeter.ac.uk), English Department, Queen’s Building, Exeter University, Exeter EX4 4QH, UK.

Ceræ Editorial Committee – Call For Applications

Ceræ: An Australasian Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies would like to invite applications from graduate students and early career researchers to join the editorial committee for its second volume, to be published in 2015.

Ceræ is a peer-reviewed Australasian journal of medieval and early modern studies. Administered from the University of Western Australia with the generous support of faculty and staff, the journal is directed by a committee of interstate and international graduate students and early career researchers united in our commitment to open-access publishing, the possibilities of the digital humanities, and to forging a strong community of medieval and early modern scholars in the region. Ceræ accepts manuscripts from any discipline related to medieval and early modern studies, including submissions with accompanying audio-visual material.

  • The role of an editorial committee member includes:
  • Conducting preliminary reviews of articles to assess their suitability for peer-review
  • Copyediting articles which have been accepted for publication
  • Participating and voting in decisions concerning the direction of the journal
  • Participating in the Ceræ AGM
  • The opportunity to apply for roles on the executive committee when these become available
  • The ability to attend fortnightly executive meetings, either in skype or in person, if desired

For further information, please contact editorcerae@gmail.com or follow the Ceræ blog at ceraejournal.com for news, updates and articles of interest.

Colours in Early Modern England – Call For Papers

‘The dyer’s hand’: Colours in Early Modern England
A special issue of E-rea (13.1, Autumn 2015)

Guest Editor: Sophie Chiari (LERMA, Aix-Marseille Université).

As Michel Pastoureau has shown, the Middle Ages were a time when heraldry changed the names and the meanings of colours and when both stained glass and manuscript illuminations testified to the rich symbolism of the vivid medieval palette. In recent years, much attention has also been paid to the new approaches to colour which emerged in 18th-century England, in the wake of Isaac Newton’s innovative ideas on the colour spectrum. Nowadays, a full range of highly saturated hues characterizes our daily environment, so much so that black and white convey both elegance andsophistication.

Yet, the function and the symbolism related to the use of colours in 15th-, 16th- and 17th-century England remain surprisingly unexplored, partly because the Aristoteliantheories of vision and colours have long been regarded as relatively limited ones, and partly because, until the 17th century, most skills related to the art and uses of colour were protected by a number of trade secrets and only circulated by word of mouth. Moreover, as a new black and white print culture was gradually taking precedence over the lavish colours of medieval manuscripts, the advent of Protestantism was at the origin of several violent reactions against the use of bright colours. Nevertheless, for all the exhortations of a handful of “chromophobic” Puritans zealots like Philip Stubbes against what they regarded as “artifice”, the iconoclastic fever which swept across early modern England never really stopped the use of polychromy.

Indeed, in spite of the corruptibility of early modern pigments and of the limited range of available hues, cloth manufactures flourished and English artists continued to use many different hues in their works. The court miniaturist Nicholas Hilliard relied for example on vibrant blue, yellow, crimson, black, white, pink, orange and green shades in his paintings. In the meantime, Shakespeare’s “dyer’s hand” (Sonnet CXI) exploited a whole range of colours in his plays and poems, from the Dark Lady of the sonnets and the black Moor of Venice to the white and red roses of the three parts of Henry VI, the yellow stockings of Malvolio in Twelfth Night or Autolycus’s “ribbons of all the colours i’ th’ rainbow” in The Winter’s Tale (4.4.206). Generallyspeaking, the circulation of clothes, cosmetics, gemstones, recipes, heraldic devices, botanical drawings, and university textbooks then partly depended on the colours which characterized them. Strikingly enough, an increasing number of dyes were marketed and, as a result, many early modern Englishmen wore red beards and dyed their hair. During the Civil War, the differentiated use of colours proved to be an important means of recognition of troops while, in the 1650s, philosophers eager to understand how their contemporaries perceived the world attempted to reconsider colour to question the reliability of senses and common sense. In his Leviathan (1651), Hobbes suggested that, like tastes and odours, colours were actually subjective (or “sensible”) qualities that one could “discern” only “by Feeling”.

Now, if early modern men and women enjoyed and promoted a variety of tinges, tones and tinctures, they were also disturbed by the uncanny power of colouring and dyeing. Theories about the significance of skin colour proliferated and contributed to the emerging construction of race which led to the creation of a series of binary oppositions between black and white. Researchers now acknowledge that colours may have served to crystallize the sexual, religious and political anxieties of an era when vivid tints were often seen as a transgression of sorts. More often than not, colours were indeed associated with poison, illness and pollution, and were therefore seen as potentially dangerous. Under Elizabeth I, the London Parliament tried invain to colour-code the citizens in order to facilitate the identification of subversive individuals. In the early 17th century, the Puritan Thomas Tuke won a lasting fame with his Treatise against Painting and Tincturing of Men and Women (1616) in which he warned his readers against cosmetic literature and attacked the “superfluous” painted faces of his time.

These examples tend to show that, in the early modern period, colour still codified gender as well as religious, political and social distinctions. In other words, colour was a symbolical and literary construct worth exploring for scholars interested in the multiple facets of identity construction in early modern England.

This special issue of the electronic journal E-rea (http://erea.revues.org/3363) aims at tracing the changing meanings of colour(s) in England from the Tudor era until the Restoration period (1485-1660). It will welcome papers dealing with the material, literary, aesthetic and sociological dimensions of colour in early modern England. Colours should thus be seen as part and parcel of the cultural codes followed or questioned by the early modern society.

Contributions might relate to but are not limited to the following questions:

How were colours made and used in England at the time?

  • Did their names actually refer to the same colours as those of today?
  • What did the use of warm or cold colours aim at symbolizing in the artistic and literary works of the period?
  • Did the circulation of prints and popular black and white engravings of the period change the perception of colours?
  • To what extent did the English see and use colours differently from continental countries?
  • What role did the Puritans play in the perception of glowing colours in early modern England?
  • Which tones happened to be culturally andsocially unacceptable, and why?
  • Could the restrictions imposed on colours actually have raised the interest of early modern contemporaries in the use of a wide variety of tints?
  • What were the main scientific theories developed on colour at the time?
  • Which writers were then interested in the topic and to which ends?
  • What was the function of colour in early modern literature and how was it used on stage?
  • Was colour gendered and, if so, what were there specific masculine and feminine hues?

Please send your paper proposal (of nomore than 300 words) with a brief CV by April 15, 2014 to Sophie Chiari: chiarisophie@hotmail.com or sophie.chiari@univ-amu.fr.

Contributors selected by the scientific committee will be notified by mid-May 2014.

Final papers will be due on November 30, 2014.

Contemporaneity: Historical Presence in Visual Culture – Call For Papers

Contemporaneity: Historical Presence in Visual Culture is a scholarly, peer-reviewed online publication edited by graduate students in the Department of History of Art & Architecture at the University of Pittsburgh. It is hosted by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program. http://contemporaneity.pitt.edu

Call For Papers

Contemporaneity: Historical Presence in Visual Culture aims to explore how the complexities of being in time find visual form. Crucial to this undertaking is accounting for how, from prehistory to the present, cultures around the world conceive of and construct their present and the concept of presentness visually. Through scholarly writings from a number of academic disciplines in the humanities, together with contributions from artists and filmmakers, Contemporaneity maps the diverse ways in which cultures use visual means to record, define, and interrogate their historical context and presence in time.

For our forthcoming issue, we seek submissions from scholars, artists, and filmmakers. Possible topics or areas of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The concept of the present across time and cultures
  • The persistence of the past in the present
  • Cultural exchange, temporal disjunction, historical coincidence
  • The simultaneity of conflicting kinds of time
  • Messianic time, circular time, the eternal return, the event, everyday life, historical time, timelessness
  • Teleology, apocalypse, the end of time, the end of art, the end of history
  • Tradition, decadence, renaissance, restoration, avant-garde, modernization
  • Phenomenology of time
  • Nostalgia, melancholy, boredom
  • Chronophobia and chronomania
  • Making time visible, representing time through images and texts, narrating
  • The life of images and reception history
  • Methodological problems concerning the writing of art history or film history

Proposals for book and exhibition reviews, interviews or scholarly discussions will also be considered. We encourage submissions from artists and filmmakers, recognizing that these submissions may take many forms. Proposals can be directed to the editors at: contemporaneity@mail.pitt.edu

The deadline for submissions is September 30, 2014. Manuscripts should be no more than 6,000 words in length and should adhere to the Chicago Manual of Style. Please visit http://contemporaneity.pitt.edu for more information.

To make a submission, click Register and create an Author profile to get started.

‘Ideas and Enlightenment’: The Long Eighteenth Century (Down Under) – Call For Papers

‘Ideas and Enlightenment’
The Long Eighteenth Century (Down Under)
David Nichol Smith Seminar in Eighteenth-Century Studies XV
The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
10-13 December, 2014

Conference Website

The Sydney Intellectual History Network and ‘Putting Periodisation to Use’ Research Group at the University of Sydney invite you to the Fifteenth David Nichol Smith Seminar (DNS), with the theme ‘Ideas and Enlightenment’. Inaugurated and supported by the National Library of Australia, the DNS conference is the leading forum for eighteenth-century studies in Australasia. It brings together scholars from across the region and internationally who work on the long eighteenth century (1688-1815) in a range of disciplines, including history, literature, art and architectural history, philosophy, the history of science, musicology, anthropology, archaeology and studies of material culture.

We welcome proposals for papers or panels on the following topics, although please note that the conference organisers are open to proposals for subjects that fall outside of these broad themes:

  • Making Ideas Visible
  • Biography and the History of Individual Life
  • Economic Ideas in Social and Political Contexts
  • Global Sensibilities
  • National Identity and Cosmopolitanism
  • Antiquaries and Alternative Versions of the Classical Tradition
  • Periodisation and the question of Period Styles
  • ‘Enlightenment’ and the Pacific
  • Spectacle, Sociability and Pleasure
  • Genres of Enlightenment
  • Science, Technology and Medicine
  • Borders and Empire
  • Historiography of the Enlightenment
  • Post-Enlightenment trajectories in literature and art

We welcome proposals for 20-minute papers. Proposals consist of a 250-word abstract and 2-page cv, sent via email as a pdf attachment to sihn.dns@sydney.edu.au. Deadline for submissions: 15 June 2014.

Further details are at http://sydney.edu.au/intellectual-history/news-events/dns-conference-2014.shtml, where accommodation and keynotes will be posted soon. If you have questions about the conference, please contact the organizing committee at sihn.dns@sydney.edu.au.

DNS XV Organizing Committee: Dr Jennifer Ferng, Prof Mark Ledbury, Prof Jennifer Milam and Dr Nicola Parsons

Dr Bridget Escombe, University of Sydney/ARC Centre of Excellence for the History of Emotions lecture

English Department at the University of Sydney/ARC Centre of Excellence for the History of Emotions lecture
“Laughter, Cruelty and Emotional Excess in Early Modern Drama and its Contemporary Revisions”, Bridget Escombe, Queen Mary, University of London

Date: Wednesday 30 July 2014,
Time: 1:00-3:00pm
Venue: Rogers Room, Woolley Building, The University of Sydney
Enquiries: Craig Lyons at craig.lyons@sydney.edu.au

Bridget Escolme explores a range of recent productions and revisions of early modern objects of laughter. Turning to comedies and treatises on laughter from the early modern period she discusses how ideas of cruelty and kindness, propriety and excess have changed and remained across four hundred years. Malvolio is treated as mad in his dark house, and Escolme focuses on the ‘mad’ as subjects and objects of humour in the early modern drama. Drawing on her recent monograph, Emotional Excess on the Shakespearean Stage, she interrogates historical and cultural assumptions around the treatment of the mad as comic spectacle, arguing that these comic figures are more powerful and theatrically dynamic, less pitiful and objectified, than scholarship has hitherto figured them. There is a long stage and critical history of ‘notoriously abused’ Malvolios who are revealed in the ‘dark house’ as bewildered and tortured; in early productions he would likely only to have been heard.


Dr Bridget Escolme is a Reader in the Drama Department at Queen Mary, University of London and a member of the Centre for the History of Emotion at QMUL. Escolme works on the performance and reception of Shakespeare and his contemporaries and their place in pedagogical practice. She has worked as a director, a performer, a dramaturge and a theatre and education practitioner.

Cockatoo Perched in Renaissance Painting Forces Rethink of History

“With its religious iconography and ornate throne, the 15th century painting Madonna della Vittoria seems a typical Italian Renaissance work – apart, that is, from the appearance of an Australasian cockatoo in the background.

The discovery of an animal more closely associated with suburban Sydney than Venice is leading historians into a rethink of early trading networks into Europe.

The painting, completed by Andrea Mantegna in 1496 and now hanging in the Louvre, clearly shows what appears to be a sulphur-crested cockatoo perched above Mary, mother of Jesus.”

Read more here: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/19/cockatoo-perched-in-renaissance-painting-forces-rethink-of-history