The conference announced on the call for papers below was originally designed for Europeanists, but was opened up to all world areas following multiple requests by non-Europeanists to participate. The CFP has therefore been revised and the deadline extended to 15 August, 2018. Applications from anthropologists, legal scholars and political scientists are especially welcome. Please note that all proposals previously submitted remain valid.

Monarchy and Modernity since 1500, University of Cambridge, 8-9 January 2019.

Europe’s past is overwhelmingly monarchical, yet the monarchies that remain in place today hardly resemble those that governed Europe at the end of the Middle Ages. Modernity has transformed monarchy from a matter of unquestioned and often sacred fact to a matter of largely secular and usually democratic choice. If the words remain the same – along with many of the families, their titles, properties and places of residence – their meaning has changed profoundly over time and across countries, so much so that, along the centuries, the working mechanisms, functions and powers of European monarchy have been transformed. The academic literature, however, seldom measures this distance between monarchy’s various historical meanings and its surprisingly frequent manifestations today.

In theoretical and speculative disciplines, the lack of inquiry into monarchy’s significance is due partly to disciplinary divisions. Political theorists, intellectual historians, experts in jurisprudence and art and literary critics rarely delve into the subject of monarchy, while historians of monarchy tend to focus on chronology rather than concepts. Monarchy’s own nature has helped determine these divisions.With its providentialist, semi-magic and mysterious foundations in the divine right of kings, monarchism is a double paradox, a form of political theory that is at once anti-political and anti-theoretical. Innovatively, this conference seeks to break disciplinary barriers by combining the outlooks of monarchical specialists on the one hand, and of social, cultural, literary and political theorists on theother.

Proceeding from the premise that the nature of things is best known, and their development mostdetermined, during critical times, this conference centers on three (long) key moments in the history ofmodern European monarchy: the English Revolution, the French Revolution, and the mainstreamingof republicanism during the first half of the twentieth century. These moments, however, are onlyreferential, and presentations studying the reinvention, representation and conceptualisation ofmonarchy during other modern periods, from 1500 to the present, are also welcome, with Renaissancesubjects possibly serving as introits and contemporary ones as epilogues to the conference.

The main lines of inquiry are twofold, one directed at monarchy’s political-legal significance, and theother at its socio-cultural, psychological, religious, literary and spiritual roles. The political-legal lineof inquiry can include – without being limited to – European monarchy’s historical relationship tolegislation and the administration of justice, as well as democratic, republican, and aristocratictraditions. The theological/sociological/anthropological perspective is instead concerned withmonarchy as a series of rituals, processions, celebrations and formal procedures that representsovereignty, organise time and relationships, lend nations a sense of identity, and connect individualsemotionally with sacred spaces and powers.

Studies of non-European monarchical traditions are likewise accepted, preferably with reference to European ones.

Contributions may address one or more of the following themes but are not limited to them:

1. Monarchy in political thought
2. Monarchy and constitutionalism
3. Monarchy in its relation with religion, theology and spirituality
4. The relationship between spiritual and temporal powers
5. Royalism vs. monarchism
6. National and sovereign representation
7. The royal imaginary, including literary representations of monarchy
8. Monarchy and property
9. Monarchy and material culture: art, fashion and the built environment
10. Royal feasts, rituals, processions and celebrations
11. Women and monarchy
12. Non-European monarchical traditions, preferably with reference to European ones.

We invite proposals for 20-minute presentations, which will be revised subsequently for publication ina peer-reviewed collective volume. Graduate students are welcome to participate, and papers in Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish are accepted, although English isencouraged to facilitate communication. The conference will be held at the University of Cambridge on 8-9 January 2019.

Please email a 200-word abstract and one-page CV to Carolina Armenteros(cra22@cam.ac.uk) by 15 August 2018.

The Society for Medieval Feminist Scholarship (SMFS) is (co-)sponsoring six panels at the 2019 International Congress on  Medieval Studies, Kalamazoo, Michigan. Details of individual panels and organisers follow.

1. Complicit: White Women and the Project of Empire

Women in medieval texts are often read as oppressed, powerless, and without agency. This panel asks how our readings of women, such as Constance in Chaucer’s Man of Law’s Tale or the Princess of Tars from The King of Tars, change when we view these women as not simply acted upon, but as complicit in the scenes of conversion and imperial power that dominate these narratives. This panel seeks papers that move beyond reading women in narratives of imperial dominance as solely victims of patriarchal structures of power, and asks what it means to recognize complicity with the project of empire alongside patriarchal oppression. The goal of this panel is to offer intersectional analyses of the project of patriarchy alongside the project of empire through a reexamination of how we define and understand women’s agency.

Send abstracts, Participant Information Form, and other inquiries to Shyama Rajendran (shyama.rajendran@gmail.com).

2. Dysphoric Pedagogies: Teaching About Transgender and Intersex in the Middle Ages (co-sponsored by The Teaching Association for Medieval Studies (TEAMS))

Students have long seemed curious about the non-binary and non-cisgender lives that appear in courses on pre-modern periods. This panel will offer a range of pedagogy techniques, lesson plans, assignments, reading lists, and anecdotes for those interested in enhancing how they teach about transgender and intersex in the Middle Ages. The concept of “Dysphoric Pedagogies” is drawn from the DSM-5 diagnostic language that describes the experience where one’s identified or expressed gender conflicts with the gender assigned by society. Scholars will share their experiences teaching dysphoria within the art, history, and literature in an era before the DSM-5 and its various diagnoses, or the coinage of the words “transgender” or “intersex.”  How have these moments of gender diversity and conflict provoked conversations about self and society, expression and audience, nature and nurture, gender norms and non-conformity, past and present?

Send abstracts, Participant Information Form, and other inquiries to Gabrielle M.W. Bychowski (Gabrielle.Bychowski@case.edu)

3. Critical Approaches to Medieval Men and Masculinities

In recent decades, there has been increasing engagement in medieval studies with questions of gender, space and identity as they relate to medieval men and masculinities. From the hypermasculine heroes of romance to Abelard’s eunuch body, performative medieval masculinities both uphold and challenge the structural frameworks that define medieval culture and society. As such, an understanding of medieval masculinities and their role in shaping culture and society is vital to a full reading of masculinities in the twenty-first century. This panel invites papers which contribute to and extend scholarship on medieval men and masculinities, particularly those which explore queer and intersectional masculinities.

Send abstracts, Participant Information Form, and other inquiries to Amy Burge (dramyburge@gmail.com).

4. Girls to Women, Boys to Men: Gender in Medieval Education and Socialization

Regardless of access to formal education, children learned how to become adults in medieval society from a variety of sources. Ruth Mazo Karras’s From Boys to Men: Formations of Masculinity in Late Medieval Europe traces some of the influences and ideologies surrounding the ways medieval boys were socialized to become men, contributing to critical masculinity studies by examining the formation in addition to the manifestation of masculinity. The manifestation of medieval concepts of femininity has been extensively studied, but more attention needs to be paid to the ways in which girls were socialized to become women. This panel will expand discussions about children and childhood, gender, and education. Questions that might be raised include: How were girls trained to become women? How were girls taught to view themselves? How were they taught to view men? How were men taught to view women? What ideologies and structures played a role in the ways girls were trained or taught? How do texts reinforce or defy the dominant models of feminine training and socialization?

Organizer: Dainy Bernstein. Send abstracts, Participant Information Form, and other inquiries to dainybernstein@gmail.com.

5. #MEditerraneanTOO (co-sponsored by the Association of Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies)

Neither rape culture nor women’s collective activism against sexual harassment and gender-based violence are 21^st century phenomena, nor are they exclusive to the US. As a collaboration between the Association of Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies and the Society of Medieval Feminist Scholarship, this panel seeks papers that examine these topics transregionally, specifically around the multi-religious environment of the medieval Mediterranean. A range of methodologies is welcome – literary assessments of the querelle des femmes, court cases on the definition of rape, archival work on sex workers and violence, laws on forced concubinage between religious traditions, analysis of hagiographic tropes of forced marriage, etc.

Organizer: Jessica Boon. Send abstracts, Participant Information Form, and other inquiries to jboon@email.unc.edu.

6. Nasty Women: Villains, Witches, Rebels in the Middle Ages (co-sponsored by the Society for the Study of Homosexuality in the Middle Ages (SSHMA))

Recent debates in modern discourse have centered around appropriate boundaries of feminine behavior. “Nastiness” has become a by-word for a specific type of womanhood, one that pushes the boundaries of acceptable sexual agency, political power, and social hierarchies. This panel will explore the various ways in “nastiness” existed in the Middle Ages, with a particular focus on gender and sexuality. How did contemporary authors, philosophers, or courts depict or deal with subversive women? How did women conceive of their own power in terms of sexual acts, gender expression, and other forms of socially-rebellious behavior? The papers in this session will address these issues through several lenses, providing new insight in the critical discourses of queer and feminist medieval scholarship.

Send abstracts, Participant Information Form, and other inquiries to Graham Drake (drake@geneseo.edu).

The conference Culture and International History VI will take place from 6 – 8 May 2019 at the John F. Kennedy Institute, Freie Universität Berlin. The conference marks the 20^th anniversary of the symposium cycle that began in 1999 and has since taken place in Wittenberg, Frankfurt, Cologne, and Berlin; key themes and contributions have been published in Berghahn Books’ series Explorations in Culture and International History (Oxford, New York, since 2003).

“Visions of Humanity” seeks to address the growing interest in historical ideas, statements, policies and actions invoking trans-, international and global audiences in the name of common values, rights and concerns. These may be manifest in activism relating to human rights, policies invoking humanitarian action, cultural output imagining trans-border societies, ideas wedding technology and the human, international protest against mechanisms of marginalization, cross-cultural canon-building (“the humanities”) and attempts to define “humanity” in academic disciplines. International history is full of people and organizations invoking visions of humanity in an effort to create common notions of identity (“we”) based on international and global reference points. But who constituted “we”? What made “us” similar? Who was part of humanity, who wasn’t? What were the mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion in humanity? And who defined and contested these criteria and decisions?

The symposium will focus on visions of humanity as they crystallize in the history of diplomatic and informal fora as well as in the context of specific debates. Specifically, the conference seeks to compare 20^th-century approaches in North American and transatlantic history to other regions and earlier periods. The range of possible topics includes but is not limited to:

• The human rights diplomacy of indigenous people
• Arts, international relations and visions of humanity
• Humanity and the humanities in international exchange
• The concept of humanity in diplomatic and legal parlance
• Minority rights vs. universal rights in international history
• Cultural diplomacy in the name of human rights & humanitarian action

We invite students and scholars of International History, Modern History, Area Studies, Theater Studies, Cultural Studies, Musicology, Art History, Psychology, Social Science, Anthropology and related fields to submit proposals before July 8, 2018. Young scholars are particularly encouraged to apply.

Proposals should include 1. a brief cover letter, 2. the title of the paper and an abstract of max. 500 words, 3. a one-page CV (all in one pdf-file).

Proposals for panels will also be considered (chair/commentator, three panelists). Pending approval, individual speakers may apply for funds covering the cost of travel and accommodation and should mention this in their application. Participants who have an interest in the topic and would like to attend the conference without delivering a paper are welcome and should contact the organizers.

Please submit proposals and questions to: verena.specht@fu-berlin.de

The Canadian Society for Renaissance Studies / Société canadienne d’études de la Renaissance (CSRS/SCÉR) will be sponsoring up to four panels at the 2019 meeting of the Renaissance Society of America, in Toronto, 17-19 March, 2019.

We invite proposals for individual papers and panels in any topic that falls within our period, from all disciplines.

Proposals must be submitted by July 10, and decisions will be made by the end of July. Any proposals that do not fit into the CSRS/SCÉR panels may be submitted to the general RSA submissions website, which closes August 15.

Anyone making a proposal must be a member of CSRS/SCÉR, and must also be a member of RSA in 2019.

Please send proposals to:

Paul Dyck
Professor of English
Canadian Mennonite University
pdyck@cmu.ca

Individual paper proposal:

• paper title (15-word maximum)
• abstract (150-word maximum) abstract guidelines
• curriculum vitae (.pdf or .doc attachment)
• PhD completion date (past or expected)
• general discipline area (History, Art History, Literature, or other)
• keywords
• full name, current affiliation, and email address
• a/v requests

Panel proposal:

• description of the panel as a whole (maximum 150 words)
• panel title (15-word maximum)
• panel keywords
• a/v requests
• panel chair
• general discipline area (History, Art History, Literature, or other)
• individual paper requirements, as above

Please find below a call for papers for a seminar that is a part of the second meeting of a conference with an innovative format. IONA: Seafaring focuses on the multicultural early medieval islands of the North Atlantic (hence, IONA) and is “Designed less around traditional conference presentations and more as a ‘workspace,’ IONA: Seafaring is designed to provide time and space for nascent and developing work, intellectual risk-taking, collaboration and cooperation”.

IONA will be held at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, from 11-13 April 2019. As part of the conference this seminar, organized by Erin Sweany, Rachel Anderson, Kristen Mills, and Margie Housley, will focus on minds, bodies, and theoretical inquiry.

Scholars studying medieval bodies and minds have encountered intersecting and overlapping questions in recent years. Physical and phenomenological experience are, to some extent, inextricable. Much scholarship on emotions has focused on the ways that feelings are embodied, through gesture, somatic response, and emotional performance. Embodied experience, likewise, is inextricable from socially- and culturally- constructed ideas — and feelings — about bodies, space, and being. Nor can the material body be removed/overlooked in our readings of texts: embodied experience of health and dis/ability, and more. Theorists such as Sara Ahmed, Elaine Scarry, and Judith Butler have shown that embodied experience is inseparable from internal/emotional experience and vice versa. At the same time, approaches to medieval minds and bodies have faced similar difficulties: methodological approaches in the sciences and social sciences are often separated from the humanities, while historicist, materialist, and philological approaches to the medieval world have often been positioned in opposition to critical theory.

Just as bodies cannot be separated from minds, and the material cannot be extracted from the phenomenological, we view history, science, and theory as intimately connected. This seminar seeks to build on and deepen this foundation with a range of approaches to feelings and bodies in the medieval North Atlantic. How can critical theory work with historicist and scientific approaches to medieval literature and culture? How can we effectively employ non-humanities methodologies in the humanities? How do these approaches shape, and how are they shaped by, feminist and queer discourses in medieval studies and across the humanities? How can medieval literary and cultural studies allow us to rethink theoretical and methodological tools within and beyond the humanities? We hope to consider new theoretical approaches, more “traditional” methodological approaches, and papers that bridge the two. Proposed papers might fall into the following thematic strands:

– Interiority and embodied affects
– Queer/feminist approaches to body and mind
– Disability/non-normativity in physical and emotional states
– Intersections of affect, gender, the non-human, race, etc.
– Historicism and anachronism in medieval studies
– Spirituality as affective and embodied experience
– Comparative literary approaches (e.g. Anglo-Saxon, Norse, and Celtic, or comparative approaches across the medieval world)
– Using science/social science methodologies such as (but not limited to): Actor- Network Theory, New Materialisms, Medical Humanities, and Systems Theory

We invite proposals from scholars working in all disciplines. Please send 250-word abstracts to Erin Sweany at esweany@indiana.edu by 1 July, 2018.
https://www.sfu.ca/english/iona/cfp/material-affects.html

For more information on IONA: https://www.sfu.ca/english/iona.html