Kara Kennedy is a PhD Candidate in English Literature at the University of Canterbury. Her write up of the 2015 PATS: ‘Medieval and Early Modern Digital Humanities’ can be found here: https://dunescholar.wordpress.com/2015/12/20/medieval-and-early-modern-digital-humanities-seminar

Sally Fisher – Monash University

ANZAMEMS: Postgraduate Advanced Training Seminar ‘Medieval and Early Modern Digital Humanities’ Report

​An illuminating article by Jock Phillips tracing digital history in New Zealand, a preliminary survey of some relevant medieval and early modern digital projects, and tentative plans afoot for my own digital project all contributed to my enthusiasm to attend the Medieval and Early Modern Digital Humanities Postgraduate Advanced Training Seminar at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch. As a training seminar, my reasons for attending were grounded in a desire to build upon my understanding of the digital humanities. One of the highlights of the day, however, was the confirmation that those skills which humanities postgraduates work so hard to hone (writing research proposals, advanced critical thinking skills, careful attention to detail) are readily transferable to digital humanities projects.

​The day consisted of two keynote presentations, an interactive session, examples of postgraduate proposals for digital projects and a panel discussion to close. ​

​Professor Evelyn Tribble (University of Otago) opened the seminar with a presentation on ‘Materiality, Affordances, and the Digital’. Using the example of early modern and modern Shakespeare scripts to explore the differences in how actors learn their lines, Tribble considered the affordances of writing technologies before moving on to a discussion of the Early English Books Online (EEBO) database within the contexts of transparency, remediation and materiality. As my own area of interest is late-medieval England, Tribble’s discussion of the EEBO was extremely useful. Highlighting the need to consider the process of digitisation and to always ask ‘what lies behind the screen’, Tribble led us between text, microfilm, and the digital database as she traced the materiality of these sources and offered suggestions for how best to use them.

​From affordances to assemblages the second keynote, ‘The Digital Recovery of Moving Media: EBBA and the Early English Broadside Ballad’, was presented by Professor Patricia Fumerton (University of California, Santa Barbara). The downfall of one of the women of my thesis became the subject of a mid-seventeenth ballad so it was with keen interest that I followed Fumerton’s discussion of the database and her reading of a seventeenth-century ballad. Moving from the geographical location used in the ballad to a discussion of the images and the accompanying music, Fumerton’s keynote confirmed the richness of the ballad as an historical source. Fumerton’s use of the term ‘assemblages’ encouraged consideration of both the ballads and the database to which they belong, reminding us how these ballads were received in their time, and how we receive them through the EBBA.

​In the interactive session Fumerton took us behind the scenes at the EBBA, from an outline of the cataloguing system to an experiment in making a broadside ballad. Yet again, I was struck by the possibilities of reading the materiality in these digital sources and the implications of this for my own work. Following on, Dr James Smithies (University of Canterbury) led us through the process of setting up our own digital project. This session moved nicely from the immensity of the EEBO and EBBA projects to demonstrate how a small-scale, or even prototype, digital project could be developed.

​After several postgraduate projects were put forward, in various stages of development, the day closed with a panel discussion featuring Dr James Smithies, Dr Chris Jones (University of Canterbury) and Joanna Condon (Macmillan Brown Library). The term ‘digital humanities’ was, rightly, the main focus of the discussion and, for me, it was a measure of the success of the seminar that my understanding had moved beyond the article by Jock Phillips, with which I began, to begin to consider not where we are now in the digital humanities, but where we might move next.

​Of course, the occasion of a PATS also affords opportunities to catch up with other postgraduates; finding moments in the breaks to discuss our work, discover shared interests and plan future projects together. These benefits cannot be underestimated, even for those who of us who are fortunate to be part of a strong postgraduate cohort at our home universities.

The day was compered by Dr Tracy Adams (University of Auckland) and organised by Dr Francis Yapp (University of Canterbury). I am grateful to ANZAMEMS and the University of Canterbury College of Arts for a travel bursary to attend the PATS.

Katherine Jacka, Doctoral Candidate, University of New South Wales

The 2015 ANZAMEMS conference at the University of Queensland was a stimulating and fruitful event and I am very grateful to ANZAMEMS for receiving a bursary which assisted me in attending. The bursaries that ANZAMEMS offers to postgraduate students and ECRs not only allow this cash-strapped cohort to attend important events but signifies the support ANZAMEMS provides to those who are at the very beginning of their academic careers. At many Australian and New Zealand universities, medieval and early modern researchers are in the minority and events like the ANZAMEMS conference are crucial in reminding us that we are part of a vibrant and robust intellectual community.

In terms of my own research interests, I was particularly excited by the round table event ‘The Global Medieval in the Antipodies’, organised by Dr Clare Monagle. As a researcher working on the Islamicate world, I have often felt a little on the outside of medieval studies which has tended to focus on the history of Europe, and in particular western and northern Europe. Thankfully in recent years there has been a growing recognition amongst historians that a deeper understanding of cross-cultural exchange and influence is necessary; culture does not develop in a vacuum and globalisation, albeit on a smaller scale, has been in play for more than two millennia. This session was an important call to action and provided many at the conference with food for thought, indeed immediately following the session a lively discussion ensued (aided by free drinks!) at the Postgraduate drinks event at the Red Room. Amongst those I talked with, there was a feeling of enthusiasm about the possibility of applying a wider historical view to their own research and for opportunities for scholarly collaboration with those working in different areas of specialisation.

As a result of this session, at the University of Sydney the Global Middle Ages Research Faculty Group has been established and a conference planned for 16-18 June 2016 on the topic of ‘Modernities in the Medieval and Early Modern Period’. Those interested in presenting and/or attending can consult the website for updates: http://sydney.edu.au/arts/research/global_middle_ages

In terms of guidance for postgraduates and ECRs, the ‘Career Options for Graduates’ round table served to remind us all to be realistic about our opportunities for future employment but to remain optimistic. The panellists advised us to keep an open mind and to recognise work opportunities besides academic positions such as editing, publishing and learning support. This was a useful session but I would have also liked to talk more about ways we can ‘sell’ ourselves in the job market as holders of a PhD. The skills required to successfully complete a PhD include high level writing and research skills, time and project management skills, as well as old-fashioned staying power. Surely there are work opportunities within government, NGOs or other organisations that would value this skill set.

I left the ANZAMEMS conference feeling buoyant, having met some great people and feeling optimistic about the future of medieval and early modern studies in Australia and New Zealand. See you at the 2017 conference in Wellington!

Ellie Crookes, Doctoral Candidate, The University of Wollongong

Thoughts on the ANZAMEMS Conference 2015

Through the generosity of the ANZAMEMS bursary, I was able to attend my first ANZAMEMS conference this year in (not so sunny) Brisbane.

This was only my fourth time presenting at a conference, and giving a paper is still quite daunting for me. The collegial encouragement and warm reception that I received however soon put me at ease, and it was soon made clear to me that ANZAMEMS was a welcoming place for a new scholar. Further, the feedback that I received after my paper was engaged and insightful, and comments, particularly from the scholars Andrew Lynch and Sahar Amer, have since proved invaluable, shaping my interpretation of texts for one of my thesis chapters, and my project as a whole.

The Round Table discussion on ‘Career Options for Grads’ was also hugely valuable, highlighting the varying career options for higher-degree medievalist scholars. However, the session also proved quite dispiriting, as it was repeatedly made clear through the session to the PhD and Masters students in attendance that very few of us would get a job in academia. This is undoubtedly an important message to drive home for new scholars, but it nevertheless left me a little crestfallen. Luckily, my spirits were raised the next day with the Round Table on the ‘Maddern-Crawford Network’ which, under the names of two great female Australian medievalists, spoke of the formation of a community of female medievalist scholars. An auditorium of feminists was always going to put me in high spirits, but the ideas put forward by key female scholars in the field for a network of female medievalists made me feel more hopeful about my future as a medievalist in Australia.

Ultimately, I left the conference not only feeling positive about the state of my research project, but also about my future as a medievalist scholar.

Fiona O’Brien, Doctoral Candidate, The University of Adelaide

Thoughts on the ANZAMEMS Conference 2015

I was fortunate to attend my second ANZAMEMS in Brisbane this year, and I was particularly excited to deliver my first paper with thanks to the generosity of the ANZAMEMS bursary committee. I would also like to thank the committee at The University of Adelaide for The Bill Cowan Bar Smith Library Fellowship for the funding I received earlier this year, which also made my attendance possible.

Prior to the conference, I had been trying to clarify my thesis methodology, and used my paper to work through some of my ideas. I was a bit nervous as to how this would be received, but I received plenty of positive feedback, and was particularly lucky to have had Professor Laura Knoppers – who had delivered a keynote on Andrew Marvell – willing to offer some incisive suggestions for my own work on Marvell. This helped me to clarify the focus my thesis would take, and upon returning to Adelaide I was re-energized enough to complete a full draft incorporating these ideas.

The keynote by Professor Alexandra Walsham also sparked my interest with a paper exploring the “interconnections between material objects (in particular commemorative Delfware), religious identity and memory in Early Modern England. My own work takes a trans-disciplinary approach to studying the Anglo-Dutch war satires of John Dryden and Andrew Marvell, and Walsham’s work gave me a new perspective on how material objects can be analysed as an expression of religious and political identity. Listening to the variety of other papers further opened my eyes to new areas of research, some of which intersected with my own in ways I had not previously considered. The panel discussion on possible career directions post-PhD was also helpful, despite the outlook sounding rather bleak at times.

My time at the conference concluded with the PATS seminar. This was a valuable opportunity for a small group of postgraduate students to discuss their work with the conference keynote’s, as well as participating in discussions on a variety of interesting articles covering the themes of Representation, Religion and the History of Emotions. I left Brisbane with a new sense of focus, a desire to stay in touch with some of those I had met, and of course, to attending the next ANZAMEMS in Wellington in 2017.

Charlotte Rose Millar, Early Career Researcher, The University of Melbourne

I always look forward to ANZAMEMS. This year’s Brisbane offering provided the same wonderful mix of amazing papers, friendly people and intellectual debate that I have come to associate with any ANZAMEMS conference. Thanks to the generous support of the ANZAMEMS committee, I was able to attend the conference for the full five days. As much as I was looking forward to the conference, I did not expect to experience the profound sense of belonging and purpose that I came away with. Perhaps I should provide some context. Almost a year ago, I submitted my PhD and I graduated in March this year. With the exception of RSA in March this year, which I attended in somewhat of a post-PhD haze, ANZAMEMS was the first conference I attended as an early career researcher. As many reading will know, this post-PhD period is a difficult time, financially, emotionally and academically. Like many recent graduates, I experienced a strange sense of loss after submitting my thesis and found it difficult to focus on the next project. ANZAMEMS reinvigorated me. Although I already had an idea of what direction I wanted my research to take, talking to ANZAMEMS delegates allowed me to shape my ideas into a much fuller form. It reminded me of my love of academia and academic research and gave me the energy and focus I needed to get working on my book proposal. In the two months since ANZAMEMS I have regained my sense of focus, my engagement with my sources, and my drive to pursue my research and am now completely re-immersed in academic life.

This would not have happened at any conference. ANZAMEMS reminds us of the wonderful scholarly community that we have in Australia. Although small, it is this smallness that makes it so valuable. ANZAMEMS delegates were intellectually rigorous, always encouraging, constructively critical, and, perhaps most importantly, genuinely interested in advancing the careers and research of early career researchers. This was particularly notable in Brisbane with the launch of the Maddern-Crawford Network for advancing female academics, a development that was met with overwhelming support. This network formalises what many ANZAMEMS members already do and could only have come out of a scholarly community that is genuinely committed to helping each other. I would like to thank the ANZAMEMS conference committee for their fantastic work in bringing the conference together and to all the delegates who made it such a wonderful experience. Here’s to another fabulous event in Wellington 2017.

Chantelle Saville, Doctoral Candidate, University of Auckland

ANZAMEMS Report 2015 – Reflections on an inspiring week.

When you find your flight home preoccupied by a swarm of ‘highly important ideas’ that you really must jot down on paper, you know for sure that you have attended a splendid conference. That is exactly what the experience of the ANZAMEMS Conference 2015 was like for me.

There was a real global atmosphere to the conference this year, with presenters attending from Scotland, Russia, Israel and the South Pacific. The theme of the first Round Table session was, in fact, ‘The Global Medieval’, discussing the prospects for future research aimed at bridging the gaps between continents and outlooks during the medieval and Early Modern period. With a number of conference panel presentations focused outside of Medieval Europe – such as “Japanese Political Thought in the 17th and 18th Centuries” – I would say that we are already on our way to achieving some great research with a ‘global’ perspective.

It was a pleasure to finally meet Samuel Baudinette (Monash University), and Prof. Yossef Shwartz (Tel Aviv University), both of whom spoke on the same panel as myself. Academics with an intellectual commitment to medieval philosophy and Dominican theology are few and far between in the South Pacific, so the opportunity to engage with a network of scholars outside the University of Auckland who share an interest in this area was greatly welcomed. I found that the discussion during and after, my panel session was very insightful, especially the challenging questions put to me following my presentation. Further, I found that listening to and observing how others presented their papers got me thinking hard about how I might present my own research more effectively, giving me models for future conference presentations.

Other papers that caught my interest included Prof. Andrew Lynch’s presentation “Reading ‘Violence’ in Later Medieval Narrative”, in which he interrogated the meaning of ‘violence’ as a medieval concept, arguing that ‘violence’ was understood more as an ’emotional force’ than a ‘physical force’. I also enjoyed Dr Diana Jefferies paper “Making Meaning of Mental Illness”, which presented a brilliant interdisciplinary approach to making meaning of mental illness in The Book of Margery Kempe and Thomas Hoccleve’s Complaint. Drawing upon her skills and expertise in the field of contemporary nursing, she emphasised the need to try to understand how the authors of the Middle English texts conceptualised and thought about the conditions they were suffering, rather than giving them a ‘post-diagnosis in hindsight’. Especially interesting was Diana’s descriptions of the kind of ‘care’ Margery and Thomas received, and the kind of ‘care’ that an individual suffering from mental illness might expect to receive today.

It is worth noting that I am a doctoral candidate in the late stages of thesis completion, so my decision to attend the ANZAMEMS conference this year was not automatic and I was not completely at ease in my environment due to the constant anxiety of finishing my work. However, the members of the ANZAMEMS community whom I talked with during lunch and tea breaks were entirely supportive and empathetic towards my position, offering advice on how to cope and manage the pressure of completing a large research project. This, I feel, is one of the very valuable aspects of the ANZAMEMS organization. As the generational spectrum of members stretches from MPhils to senior research academics, there is great opportunity for those with advanced experience to offer their personal insights to the members of the community on the first rungs of the academic ladder.

On behalf of the graduates who received travel bursaries this year I would like to thank those who enabled us to attend the conference. It was a truly rich and productive collaborative experience.

Shannon Lambert, Doctoral Candidate, University of Adelaide

In July, I attended the ANZAMEMS Conference at the beautiful University of Queensland. I was fortunate enough to have the support of an ANZAMEMS conference bursary to help with some of the costs associated with attending. This was the second time I have received an ANZAMEMS postgraduate bursary for conference travel, and I would like to thank ANZAMEMS for their commitment to supporting postgraduates. I know I represent my fellow postgraduates when I say that this support is greatly appreciated.

Perhaps because of the topic of the paper I gave—“becoming-drone” in Shakespeare’s The Rape of Lucrece—the word “buzzing” comes to mind when I think back on this conference. In the breaks between sessions, the hall was filled with conversation, and it was so motivating to be part of a collective with a shared interest in medieval and early modern periods. I always enjoyed hearing about people’s research, and sharing what I do. In the sessions I attended, the presenters captured the attention of the audience, who, in turn, expressed their interest by asking carefully thought-out questions. From the sessions I attended, I particularly enjoyed the affective transmissions of Jennifer Clement’s “Sermon Theory,” the liveliness and animation of the panel on “Facial Feeling in medieval English Literature,” and, as so many others have noted, the enthusiasm which flowed from Barnaby Ralph’s “A sense of ‘humour’?”

I gave my paper in the final session of the final day. While it was not my first experience preparing and delivering a conference paper, it was the first time I had spoken in front of a specialist early modern audience. Unlike the first paper I gave at a conference, which came at the beginning of my candidature, this paper was drawn from the deep depths of the final chapter of my thesis; therefore, in preparing my paper, I faced the (new) challenge of having to adapt detailed work I had done into an accessible twenty-minute talk. What, for example, were the “key terms” of my paper? What could I assume people would know? And, how could I (temporarily) bundle together the spindly threads of a Deleuzian approach, while making sure that this bundle was loose enough to allow people to thread its strands into their own lines of thinking? I was so grateful for the audience’s receptiveness to my post-structural reading of Shakespeare’s Lucrece, and the questions I was asked were refreshing. The audience also helped me to develop my thinking about the early modern materials which informed my talk. I would like to especially thank Karin Sellberg for her positivity, and for being so forthcoming with her questions and feedback. The greatest lesson I will take away from this conference is to have confidence in myself and my work—developing this will help me to manage the nerves of facing the “unknown” in the post-paper question time.

Thank you once again to ANZAMEMS for organising such a lively conference, and to the bursaries committee for your continued support of postgraduates. Congratulations to everyone who attended the 2015 ANZAMEMS conference; you made it an event I will remember for its diversity, energy, and “buzz.”

Ayelet Zoran-Rosen, Doctoral Candidate, New York University

ANZAMEMS Conference Report

The tenth biennial ANZAMEMS conference was my first conference in the southern hemisphere, and it was a wonderful experience. The conference program beautifully manifested the many faces of medieval and early modern life. Panels covered an impressive amount of topics from multiple disciplinary and methodological perspectives, including fear, hostility and violence alongside politics and the production of art; discussions of the aspirations of kings and queens as well as the lives of their humble subjects; analysis of religion and science and many more.

Even though there were not many participants working on the Ottoman Empire in the conference, my paper fit nicely into the panel entitled “the representations of power”, with paper topics ranging from the Vatican and Venice to the Ottoman Balkans. The panel showed that when it comes to power and its reflection outwards, grouping these different rulers and political systems together makes for an interesting and meaningful discussion. I was happy and grateful to have received many thoughtful questions and comments from the audience during and after our panel.

It is a well-known fact that the importance of academic conferences lies not only in the new research that is presented during the talks and panels, but also in the social events before and after them. This was definitely true for this conference as well. Thanks to the efforts of the organizing committee at the University of Queensland, I had the pleasure of making the acquaintance of many colleagues from across Australia and New Zealand and learn about relevant research in their home institutions. I am sure that these connections will prove fruitful in the future, and I look forward to meet everybody again in 2017, in Wellington.

Roberta Kwan, Doctoral Candidate, Macquarie University

ANZAMEMS 2015 report

It was at the 2012 ANZAMEMS-sponsored PATS workshop at the University of Otago that I was helped to develop a deeper understanding of the necessarily interdisciplinary nature of research in the early modern period. While, as a literature student writing a PhD on Shakespeare and Reformation theology, I knew that my project sits somewhat at the intersection of literature and theology, I didn’t appreciate the breadth of knowledge from a range of other disciplines I would also require. I departed from the workshop with some constructive approaches to my project, and a lot of work to do.

That was in the first year of my PhD candidature. Nearing its end (hopefully) I was especially looking forward to the opportunity to hear from scholars across a range of disciplines at this year’s ANZAMEMS, including some people I met at the 2012 PATS. I enjoyed hearing Barnaby Ralph range across a number of disciplines in showing how the employment of humoral theory shifted from the medical to the artistic realm, and found Alexandra Walsham’s lecture particularly beneficial. The abundant and intriguing images she presented and discussed gave a rich sense of the material culture of the Reformation, and how the Reformation narrative was remembered by everyday English men and women. As Professor Walsham argued, the presence of theologically- and religiously-derived images on household items for both ideological and commemorative purposes provides evidence that nuances the widely-held perception of the reformers as unreservedly iconoclastic. This was an insight I found almost immediately relevant for my project. I was also pleased to see Shakespeare make several appearances in the programme, and to have the opportunity to hear some thought-provoking papers on various plays and aspects of performance.

I would like to thank the organisers of this year’s conference for putting together a stimulating, interdisciplinary programme. Thank you also to ANZAMEMS for supporting postgrad students, financially and otherwise—this was the second occasion in which I have been a grateful recipient.